Jainism recognizes two fundamental principles. They are:
- The jiva tattva - It means living objects.
- The ajiva tattva - It means non-living objects
These two principles come into contact with one another and forge certain energies that bring forth birth, various experiences of life and death. There is a five-fold ethical code in Jainism. It is as follows:
- Ahiñsā - non-violence
- Satya - truth
- Asteya - non-stealing
- Brahmacharya - celibacy
- Aparigraha - non-acceptance of gifts
"the kinship of the religions of India stems from the fact that Jains, Buddhists and Sikhs look back to Hinduism as their common mother." - S. Vernon McCasland
Pan-Hindu monarchs, while being devout to a particular sect themselves were open to accepting and supporting their family members being of any other sect. King Kharvela the Jain king of Kalinga was called a "sarva pasanda pujaka" and "sarva devayatana samskarana". Line 17th of his Hatigumpha inscription also reveals that he repaired the temples of all the deities.
Origin of Jainism
The origin of Jainism is such that it claims to be established by Rishabha, Kashyapa (perhaps refering to Rishabha), or in one case Gautama.
Jains have historically also been known as Nigranthas, Nagnas, and Kshapanakas.
Brahm in Jainism
Although Jain scriptures normally focus on achieving the statehood of the Jina, rather than explain a Supreme Jina to which all Jinas belong, there latter does find mention. The notion of a Supreme above all is clear in some Jain scriptures. There has been association between Tirthankaras and Brahm (Brāhman) within the texts. The second, Tirthankar, Ajita in the Svayambhu Stotra is described as "Brahma-nisṭha" and is requested to bestow "Jinasri" on the devotee. Later in the same scripture, Brahmā is described of as being the highest principle, "ahiñsa bhutanam jagati viditam brahma paramair." There is also Jinesvara Suri's Gaharayanakoṣa scripture which begins first with a prayer to Jina, and then Brahman.
The name Brahmā (not to be confused with Brāhma) has been used in Jainism also in titles conferred on both Jain scholars and temples. Hasmukhlal Dhirajlal Sankalia suggests that names like Brahmasaraṇu suggest the person has realized or is after Brahman  There were some great scholars who took this title and examples are Brahmachintamani, Brahmaguṇadasa, Brahmajinadasa, Brahmajinasagara, Brahmananka, Brahmapunyasagara and Brahmasantidas. Furthermore, the Parsvadeva Basadi, a temple of Parshvanatha of Tailangere is known as Brahma Jinalaya.
Some scholars make it clear that Brahman is an entity and Supreme Brahman and even compare it to personifications of God Almighty. The Jain Scholar Yogindu called Paramātma by many names including Brahman and Jinadeva. He writes, "Jinadeva is present in all the temples of the body and man would be fool to seek him in temples." He compares the perfection of Jina to other names that the perfect entity is called. The body, etc. are not the highest self that is here known stainless (nirmala), timeless (niṛkala), pure, Jina, Śiva, Viṣṇu and peaceful. He also says, "If the highest Brahman is not realized through great meditation one has to wander infinitely suffering the miseries of transmigration."
A few scholars have made it a required belief to believe in the Supreme Jina. Acārya Vijay Bhuvanbhanusuri writes, "If philosophers do not believe in the omniscient Jinendradeva as the reverend Supreme Lord, then there is no Jainatva in them." A Jain scripture says one "should center one's mind, heart and soul in mastering intellectual recognition-perception of the Supreme Self through philosophic erudition and thus ultimately become himself the Lord of Lords namely the dispassionate Jinendradeva."
In the Mahāpurāṇa of Jinasena-Guṇabhadra, the Jina is called the creator and destroyer of the universe. The following is an excerpt from a Jain scripture:
- That which is formless is given a form. He is the form of the universe, the lord of the world. It is the embodiment (murti) of enlightenment (kevala-jnāna), the one who has conquered all passions, the Jina lord. The embodiment of the Jina shows the teacher of the world as absorbed in the ultimate (Brahmā).
Sureśvara was the chief disciple of Adi Shankar Acharya and he used the word ātmā to connote the Brahman at times and other times the jivatma. Digambara Jain scholar Vijayananda in his Astasahasri quotes Suresvara's Brhadaranyakopanishad-bhasya-varttika.
Many Jains, especially renowned scholars have denied that Jainism is atheist. Renowned Jain philosopher, Vijayasena Suri in the court of Akbar when accused of preaching atheism declared that Jainism's belief is not atheistic and is similar to the Sañkhya of Kapila. Sañkhya advocates a Nirguṇa Atman or a plurality of selves.) Similar to this view, some advocated monism. The Ekavada or monism is discussed by some Jains. One commentator even refers to the Upaniṣadic idea of Brahman. It corresponds to the Buddhist idea of Ekaccasassatavada mentioned in Brahmajala Sutta.
Jainism and Vedic scriptures
Jainism not nastika doctrine
Scholar Annāsaheba Latthe writes that Jainism cannot be called a nāstika doctrine because some its Tirthankaras are "worshiped and praised" in the Vedas. Jains themselves have been branded nāstikas for not accepting the Vedas and they in turn have accused many non-Jains of being Nāstikas. According to Jainism, nastikavāda is a system of beliefs that are nāstika in nature. Jains assign the term nāstika to one who is ignorant of the meaning of the religious texts or those who deny the existence of the soul.
Tirthankaras in Vedic scriptures
|Riṣabha||But Riṣabha went on, unperturbed by anything till he became sin-free like a conch that takes no black dot, without obstruction ... which is the epithet of the First World-teacher, may become the destroyer of enemies||Ṛgveda|
|Riṣabha||Om namo arhato Rsabho, om Rsabhah pavitram.
Om trataramindram Rshabham vadanti amrtaramindram
|Ariśtanemi||So asmakam Aristanemi svaha Arhan vibharsi sayakani dhanvarhanistam yajatam visvarupam arhannidam dayase||[[Ṛgveda]|
|Ariśtanemi||Om svasti na indro vrddhasravah
svasti nah pIZsa vis'vavedrih
svasti na sta'rksyo Aristanemih
svasti no brhaspatir dadha'tu
anena svastikena bhagavad durgciya'h
| Ṛgveda / |
The Ṛgveda mentions Ṛṣabha the 1st Tirthankara and Ariśtanemi the 22nd. The Yajurveda mentions both of them and then Ajitanatha and Suparshva too, in cantos 25 and 92. Below are documented sections of scripture that reference one or more of the 24 Jinas venerated in Jainism:
- Aitareya Brāhmana
- Sarvanukramanika by Kātyāyana
- Vedartha Dipika by Sadguru Śishya
- Śayana Bhāsya
- Skanda Purāṇa - Prabhas Khanda
- Bhāgavata Purāṇa
- Markandeya Purāṇa
Jain interpretation of Vedas
As mainstream Hindu scriptures don't declare the Vedas themselves fundamental to achieving Mokṣa but as holy texts, so too many Jains view them as sacred but not fundamental for Mokṣa. Vaṣiṣṭha Ṛṣi for instance, in his Dharmasutra declared, "acharahinam na punanti vedah".
Some historical Jain scholars have believed the Vedas actually represent metaphorical sacrifices, a claim which the Upaniṣads also endorse! In this view, the sacrifices are seen as proper human behavior to destroy desire. The Uttaradhyayana Sutra outlines the story of Jain Brahmin Jayagosha confronting a staunch orthodox Vedic sage and when the sage asks Jayagosha to tell him the meaning of Vedas, the latter supplies the Jain view.
:Orthodox Vedic Sage: Tell us the most essential subject in the Vedas, and tell us what is most essential in the sacrifice; tell us the first of the heavenly bodies, and tell us the best of dharmas.
:Jayagosha: The most essential subject in the Vedas is the agnihotra, and that of the sacrifice is the purpose of the sacrifice; the first of the heavenly bodies is the moon, and the best of dharmas is that of Kaśyapa (e.g., Riśabha).
:Jayagosha: The beautiful (gods) with joined hands praise and worship the highest Lord (i.e. the Tirthankara) as the planets, &c., (praise) the moon.
According to the Dipika commentary of Uttaradhyayana Sutra by Harshakula, the "sacrifice" here means the ten virtues: truth, penance, content, patience, right conduct, simplicity, faith, constancy, not injuring anything and Samvara.
In the Uttaradhyayana Sutra, Harikeśa states:
:Austerity is my agni, the soul is fire place, meditation is offering-ladle, the body is the dried cow-dung as fuel and actions are the kindling wooden-sticks;.
Renowned scholar Vimalasuri in Ussesa in another scripture interprets the Vedic sacrifices as metaphorical to sacrifice the animals within and that this true way is the Arṣa-Veda (Veda of Ṛṣis) or the Vedas:
:"Body is the altar, mind is the fire blazing with the ghee of knowledge. This fire consumes or destroys completely the heap of sacrificial sticks of sins produced by the tree of karman.
:Anger, pride, deceit, greed, attachment, hatred, and delusion-these passions along with the senses, are the sacrificed animals which are to be killed. Truth, forgiveness, nonviolence are the adequate sacrificial fee which is to be paid. Right faith, conduct, self-control, celibacy, etc., are the gods (to be propitiated). This is the true sacrifice as laid down in the venerable Vedas and expounded by the venerable Jinas. This sacrifice, when performed with complete contemplation or profound meditation, brings the reward, not heaven, but the highest nirvana (=mokṣa) liberation.
:Those, however, who perform sacrifices by actually slaughtering animals go to hell just like hunters."
This "Arsa-Veda" spoken of by Vimalasuri is also spoken of by some other scholars such as MadhavaTemplate:Dn and Aurobindo. So then some scholars believe that originally both the Samanic and mainstream Hindu sects had the same Vedas.
The Buddhist Suttanipata makes a reference to "the Vedas of the Samanas as well as those of the Brahmins." There are Jains even in modern time that believe the Jainism originates from the Veda. An example is given by scholar T.N. Dhar who visited Mathura and met with a Swami Vijayananda of the Digambara sect that made this claim.
Another scholar that claimed to have the compassionate message of the true Vedas is Thiruvalluvar, who is believed by many scholars to have been a Jain. His parentage is from a Brahmin father and he was addressed "Aravalianthanan" (Brahmin who possesses the wheel of dharma.) Many writers have written of him and in one quote is a relationship made between him and the message of the Vedas, "Of him It is no other than Ayan (Brahma) himself, seated on the beautiful lotus-flower, who, assuming the form of Valluvar, has given to the world the truths of the Vedas, that they may shine without being mixed up with falsehood." Silappadikaram quotes a verse from it. Nikakesi too quotes from it a few times, and whenever it does it proclaims of the Kural, "as is mentioned in our scripture".
Further, Jain Sage Jinabhadra in his Visesavasyakabhasya cites a number of passages from the Vedic Upanishads. Even many of the Vedic sages are honored by Jain scholars, for their asceticism. Sages like Yajnavalkya, Rajaputra, Nara, Nārada, Gautama, Apastamba, Angirasa, and Romapada are also mentioned in the Yasastilaka for their austerities. Somadeva, author of the Yasastilaka goes on to honor the priest craft of Pingala, Matanga, Marichi and Gautama chanting the Sāman and quotes some Vedic authorities like Mānu, Vyāsa, Vasistha and others.
Jains partaking in Vedic ceremonies
Historically Vedic ceremonies have been a part of several members of the Jain laity. Some Jain royal families of southern Kanara had Somanatha as their monarchy's official deity and even conducted worship ceremonies officiated by Jain priests. The pattabhiseka ceremony for the Jain king of Vandar was performed by a Vedic Srauta priest.
- P. 95 Modern India and the Indians: Being a Series of Impressions, Notes, and Essays By Sir Monier Monier-Williams
- Religions of the World S. Vernon McCasland, Grace E. Cairns, David C. Yu
- It means worshiper of all sects".
- P. 109 Jain Journal, Volume 39 By Jain Bhawan
- It means builder of temples for all sects.
- It means "Sava devayatana sanakara karako."
- P. 144 Proceedings - Indian History Congress, Part 1 By Indian History Congress
- Svayambhu Stotra sloka 10
- It means engrossed in Self.
- P. 93 Jain Journal, Volume 37, By Jain Bhawan
- Svayambhu Stotra sloka 119
- P. 386 Journal of the Oriental Institute, Volume 41 By Oriental Institute, 1991
- Studies in the historical & cultural geography and ethnography of Gujarat: places and peoples in inscriptions of Gujarat: 300 B.C.-1300 A.D. By Hasmukhlal Dhirajlal Sankalia
- P. 4639 Encyclopaedia of Indian Literature: sasay to zorgot edited by Mohan Lal
- It means Śānta.
- It refers to Jainhood.
- P. 64 Samadhi shatak: a century of verses on concentration or self-absorption By Devanandi
- Form means rupa.
- P. 21 Framing the Jina: Narratives of Icons and Idols in Jain History By John Cort
- P. 73 Suresvara's Vartika On Yajnavalkya'S-Maitreyi Dialogue edited by Shoun Hino
- P. 72-73 A History of Early Vedānta Philosophy By Hajime Nakamura
- P. 237 A History of Gujarat: Mughal period, from 1573 to 1758 By Mānekshāh Sorābshāh Commissariat
- P. xvii Yoga Philosophy of Patanjali: Containing his yoga aphorisms with Vyāsa's commentary in Sanskrit and a translation with annotations including many suggestions for the practice of yoga By Patañjali, Swami Hariharānanda Āraṇya
- P. 379 The Principal Upaniṣads by Swami Nikhilananda
- P. 64 Jain Agamas: an introduction to canonical literature By K. L. Chanchreek
- P. 32 An Introduction to Jainism By Annasaheba Latthe
- Page i, Forms of Indian Philosophical Literature and Other Papers by V.S. Kambi
- P. 163 Mahavira: His Life and Teachings by Bimala Churn Law
- P. 173 Unifying Hinduism: philosophy and identity in Indian intellectual history By Andrew J. Nicholson
- Ṛgveda X.166
- Ṛgveda Astak 2, Varga 7
- Ṛgveda 1.89.6a
- Sāmaveda 2.1225
- P. 126 Ritual Worship of the Great Goddess: The Liturgy of the Durga Puja with By Hillary Rodrigues.) This mantra also appears in the Kaivalya Upaniṣad P. 5-6 Kaivalya Upaniṣad By Swami Chinmayananda
- Ṛgveda 8,8,24; and 10,178,1
- Yajurveda 25, 19 and 9, 25
- Sāmaveda (4, 1)
- Atharvaveda 20, 143, 10
- Aitareya Brāhmana 20, 2
- Yasknirutka 10, 12
- Śayana Bhāsya P. 678
- Skanda Purāṇa 16, 96
- Bhāgavata Purāṇa 2, 7, 10
- Markandeya Purāṇa 50, 39-41
- Dharmasutra VI, 3
- It means "Vedas do not purify one."
- Uttaradhyayana Sutra, Chapter 25
- P. 9 Studies in Buddhism By Okisa Sanskrīti Pariṣada
- canto XI
- Arsa means "speech of a Rishi"
- P. 136-137 sacrifice in India By Sindhu S. Dange
- P. 92 Studies in Jain literature by Vaman Mahadeo Kulkarni, Sresh?hi Kasturabhai Lalabhai Smaraka Nidhi
- P. 112 History of the Dvaita School of Vedanta and its literature : from the earliest beginnings to our own times By B N K Krishnamurti Sharma
- P. 154 Early Buddhist Theory of Knowledge By Kulatissa Nanda Jayatilleke
- Inner World Outer World By T.N. Dhar
- P. 78 Jain Journal, Volume 5 By Jain Bhawan
- P. 59 Tales and Poems of South India By Edward Jewitt Robinson
- P. 107 A Comprehensive History of Jainism: From the Earliest Beginnings to AD 1000, Volume 1 By Asim Kumar Chatterjee
- P. 93 Studies in Jain literature by Vaman Mahadeo Kulkarni, Sresh?hi Kasturabhai Lalabhai Smaraka Nidhi
- P. 160 Brahmanism, Jainism, and Buddhism in Andhra Desa By P. Arundhati
- P. 21 Brahmanism, Jainism, and Buddhism in Andhra Desa By P. Arundhati
- P. 71 On an Auspicious Day, at Dawn -: Studies in Tulu Culture and Oral Literature By Heidrun Brückner