Difference between revisions of "Talk:Narada: The Sage Celestial"

From Hindupedia, the Hindu Encyclopedia
(publish as narada)
 
(15 intermediate revisions by 4 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
'''By Swami Purnananda'''
 
  
What would you feel if you were asked the question: How did you die? You would perhaps be bemused for a while and then feel convinced that your interlocutor was out of his head. But when Narada was asked this question by Krishna Dvaipayana Vyasa he was not taken by surprise; nor did he feel uncomfortable. Instead, his face lit up with a radiant smile as he proceeded to answer this seemingly unanswerable question.
 
 
 
== Counsellor to Vyasa ==
 
 
Once Vyasa was lamenting over the great dissatisfaction and unrest that was tormenting his mind even though he was well versed in the Vedas, had lived in consonance with dharma, and devoted himself to the welfare of all beings. He sat on the banks of River Saraswati cogitating on the cause of the depressive thoughts that were constantly weighing on his mind. Just then Narada happened to arrive at Vyasa’s ashrama in the course of his perpetual peregrination across the three worlds. Tough he was received with due respect, Narada realized that Vyasa was disturbed. So afer praising him for his many achievements, he enquired afer his well-being:
 
 
Jijñāsitam­adhītaṁ ca yat­tat­brahma sanātanam;
 
Athāpi śocasyātmānam­akṛtārtha iva prabho.
 
 
 
O master of oneself, you have realized the eternal Brahman by the process of proper discrimination; why then do you look mentally troubled, as though possessed by a sense of futility.<ref>Bhagavata, 1.5.4. </ref>
 
 
 
Vyasa replied: ‘I am aware that I have the excellences you mention; yet I have no peace of mind. I feel dissatisfed. I think I have some shortcoming, which I am unable to make out. You are a man of wisdom, the son of the Creator, and a beloved devotee of the Lord. You travel all over the three worlds  and  can penetrate  into  everything. You know the thoughts of every being. Be kind, I pray, and tell me the causes of my dysphoria.’
 
 
 
Narada pointed out the reason for Vyasa’s distress in a succinct reply:  ‘You have not adequately described the unblemished glory of the Supreme Lord in your works. Tat is why he is not pleased with you. And for that reason, I reckon, your knowledge is incomplete.’ Afer elaborating upon his statement, he advised Vyasa to recall the divine play of the Lord by means of samadhi (and describe it) for liberation from all worldly bonds: ''urukramasyākhila-­bandha­muktaye samādhinānusmara tad­-viceitam (1.5.13).''
 
 
 
== The Housemaid’s Son ==
 
 
 
While dwelling on the need for contemplating and expounding  the glories of Bhagavan, Narada  recalled one of his previous births as a housemaid’s son:  ‘In one of my previous lives I was born of a housemaid who was engaged  in a household of Vedic ritualists. I was appointed to serve the yogis who gathered at the place for cāturmāsya, retreat
 
during the rainy season. Although impartial by nature, they were very gracious to me as I had engaged myself sincerely in their service. Moreover, I was self-restrained and devoid of childish frivolity. I was also obedient, reserved, and not fond of sports or games like other children. Having obtained their consent, I once partook a little of the remains of their meal. Tat was enough to free me from all past sin. With my mind thus purifed, I felt greatly inclined to listen to the divine glories of the Lord that the sages were always engaged in singing. Gradually I developed an irresistible attraction for the Divine. My mind became steady  in  its devotion to the Lord and I could realize that my gross and subtle bodies, born of ignorance, were superimpositions on my real Self, the Atman. Thus, by hear-ing continuously the glories of the Lord from these great souls, throughout the rainy season and autumn, there arose in my heart that devotion which destroys rajas and tamas. As they were leaving, the kind and compassionate sages instructed me in the transcendental spiritual truths that are revealed by the Lord himself, for though a mere child, I was devoted, humble, guileless, respectful, restrained, and obedient by nature. By means of this knowledge I could realize the infuence of maya, the power of the Lord; and this knowledge leads one to divine beatitude. So I also attained this state and became one of the pārṣadas, immediate associates, of the Lord.’
 
 
 
Vyasa’s curiosity was aroused by this remarkable story. He wanted to know more about the house-maid’s son, and his questions included the following: ‘Kathaṁ cedam­udasrākṣīḥ kāle prāpte kalevaram; in the end, how did you give up that mortal frame of yours?’ (1.6.3). Narada replied: ‘I was the only son of my mother. Tough she was deeply attached to me, being but a mere housemaid, she was hardly capable of properly looking afer me. All beings are under the control of Providence, much like puppets in the hands of a puppeteer. I was still a mere boy when my poor mother was fatally bitten by a venomous snake while on her way to milk a cow. Taking this to be a blessing (in disguise) for my welfare, I lef home and started walking north, surrendering myself to the divine Will. Passing through towns, villages, farms, and mines; through groves, jungles, and forests; and by the side of lakes flled with lotuses, at last I reached a dense and forbidding forest. Hungry, thirsty, and tired, I refreshed myself by bathing and
 
drinking at a forest stream. Sitting under a pipal tree  in that remote and desolate forest, I started meditating upon the Supreme Being immanent in oneself, as instructed by the sages. As I meditated on the  lotus feet of the Lord, with a mind flled with devotion, and eyes brimming with tears due to the intensity of aspiration, my beloved Lord ap-
 
peared in my heart. O Vyasa! How can I express the joy I experienced! With my hair standing on end in ecstasy, I was lost in an ocean of divine bliss. But alas! Te vision disappeared and I could no more see that pleasing divine form that destroys all sor-row. I was utterly upset; I got up from the seat with a distressed mind. I tried again to dive deep into my mind and search for the divine form, but all efort proved futile. Deprived of the vision of the Lord, I became flled with frustration and anguish.
 
 
 
‘Just then, as  if to assuage my grief, the Lord spoke  to me  in  a deep,  sweet  voice:  “My  boy!  Lament not, you shall not have any further vision of me. To those who are not established  in yoga, whose minds are smeared with the taint of world-liness, I remain invisible. O taintless one! You have had my rare vision once, and this I bestowed to en-hance your yearning for me. With the increase in right yearning, my devotees gradually give up all de-sires lodged in their minds and become pure; and only those that are pure in heart can have my constant vision. Trough service to pure souls—even though it was only for a short while—you have developed unfinching devotion towards me. You will give up this mortal frame of yours within a short time and have the rare privilege of being one of my pārṣadas. Moreover, your devotion to me will never be diminished and your recollection of me will not be afected by Creation or Dissolution.”
 
 
 
‘That formless Elysian voice which had assumed a spatial form, as it were, in my heart ceased to be heard thereafer. I bowed my head in salutation to that Noble Being. Repeating the auspicious names of the Lord, the Infnite Being, and recollecting his sacred and mysterious acts, I became contented in mind—devoid of attachment and shame, and free from egotism and malice. Waiting eagerly for the time of my being directly associated with the Lord, I kept wandering across the globe. For me, who was intensely devoted to the Lord, pure in heart, and  totally detached  from all mundane objects, the moment of departure arrived suddenly  like a fash of lightning. Te sacred and pure godly body, bhāgavatī tanu, made of pure sattva and ft for the service of the Lord, was generated in me even as my mortal body born of the fve elements dropped away on exhaustion of its past karma.
 
 
 
‘At the end of the cosmic cycle, when all creation was withdrawn into the causal state and the Supreme Being  lay  resting on  the causal waters, kāraṇa salila, I too entered his divine body along with Brahma, his creative breath. Afer a thousand divine aeons, when the Lord again resolved to create this world, I was born of his vital breath along
 
with such rishis as Marichi and Atri. Committed to celibacy, I have been roaming the three worlds unhindered, by the grace of the Lord, chanting the divine name “Hari”, striking melodious notes on the strings of the vina that the Lord has himself given me. When I sing his glories to the accompaniment of the celestial  lute, the Supreme Lord of endearing fame and sanctifying feet appears in my heart, as if promptly responding to a call by one’s name. Tis is the story of my death and birth, which you wanted to know.’<ref>See Bhagavata, 1.5–6.</ref>
 
 
 
We  learn from this story that Narada had descended directly from Brahma, the Creator. At the beginning of every cosmic cycle, Narada accepts a gross body, and at the time of cosmic dissolution he merges into the Lord. He never loses the memory of his birth and disappearance  in each cycle. Sri Ramakrishna pointed out that Narada  is a nitya jiva, an ever free, eternally perfect being. Being a direct associate of the Lord, he is a free soul, never caught in the clutches of maya. Having broken the fetters of karma, he has gone beyond the bondage of birth and death as well as the other miseries of the world.
 
 
 
 
== Seeker of Self-knowledge ==
 
 
 
The cosmic dimensions of Narada’s  life make  it very difcult for us to reconstruct his life history. He was, of course, a very famous sage even at the time the Aitareya Brahmana was recorded. He is widely recognized as a fascinating, albeit difcult to-understand, personality. Narada is a man of wisdom. Yet  in the Chhandogya Upanishad we fnd him approaching the sage Sanatkumara for spiritual instruction. Sanatkumara, one among the frst four sannyasins, was a sibling to Narada, having been born of Brahma. When Narada requested Sanatkumara to teach him, Sanatkumara said: ‘Tell me what you already know, and I shall teach you what  is beyond that.’ Narada replied with a  long list: ‘I have studied the Rig Veda, Yajur Veda, Sama Veda, and Atharva Veda the fourth; Itihasas and Puranas—history  and mythology—which  are the ffh Veda; Vyakarana, by means of which the meaning of the Vedas is understood; the rites for manes, mathematics, natural science, mineralogy, logic, ethics, etymology, science of rituals, material sciences, the science of warfare, astrology, her-petology, and the fne arts—I know all this. But, O venerable sir, even afer this vast study I am only a mantravit, knower of texts, not an ātmavit, knower of the Atman. I have learnt from persons of wisdom like you that the knower of the Atman alone can cross the ocean of misery; and I am aficted with
 
misery. Therefore, my Lord, rescue me from this ocean of misery.’ <ref> Chhandogya Upanishad, 7.1.1–3. </ref>
 
 
 
Sanatkumara did impart the knowledge of Brahman to Narada. But what interests us here is the wide range of Narada’s study and the vast repertoire of skills he commanded. Te irony is that despite possessing such vast knowledge—virtually impossible for any one human being to attain in a lifetime Narada lacked peace of mind. Tat is why he came to Sanatkumara seeking the knowledge of the Self, for this knowledge can give peace of mind. Self-knowledge or the knowledge of Brahman is called parāvidyā, supreme knowledge, and all else is inferior knowledge, aparāvidyā. As Sri Ramakrishna has said, ‘Tat alone is Knowledge through which one is able to know God. All else is futile.’<ref> M, The Gospel of Sri Ramakrishna, trans. Swami Nikhilananda (Chennai: Ramakrishna Math,2002), 368. </ref>
 
 
 
Secular knowledge has  its own value. Hence the Chhandogya Upanishad speaks of two types of knowledge, dve vidye, the parā and the aparā. But Narada’s experience reminds us that peace of mind or genuine contentment and happiness cannot be had without the knowledge of God. Narada had realized this truth; therefore he could tell Vyasa to describe the divine play and glory of the Lord, listening to which would arouse unfinching devotion to God in human hearts. And such devotion brings lasting peace and bliss.
 
 
 
 
== An Enigma ==
 
 
 
His wisdom notwithstanding, there are times when Narada behaves like any common person, at times even like an ignorant one. This lends his char-acter its intriguing aura. Here is one such in-stance: Once Narada  became  a  little proud  of  his musical  abilities—that none could play the vina as well as he did. Bhagavan Vishnu came to know  this  and  thought:  ‘My devotees should not be boastful. So Narada ought to be taught a lesson.’ He took Narada for a walk into a forest. Suddenly they heard someone weeping. On following the sound they found some women with badly deformed bodies crying in pain. Vishnu asked them who they were and why they were weeping. The women replied:  ‘We are the Raginis,  the deities of music.Our bodies have been disfigured by Narada’s erroneous selection of notes. He is tone-deaf and has little musical sense. His singing is out of tune with his music, and this has disfigured us.’ Narada was humbled.
 
 
 
On the face of it, many of Narada’s actions and endeavours appear strange and meaningless; but deep meaning underlies each of them. He is intelligent and wise, a good counsellor and a great devotee of the Lord. He wishes all beings well. He has no enemies. He can visit any-body, anywhere and at any time, irrespective of their social standing whether they be gods, demons, or human beings—for he is a sincere counsellor. All the same, his intrusions do look awkward at times.
 
 
 
On hearing a celestial voice warning him that he would meet his death at the hands of the eighth  issue of his cousin Devaki, Kamsa, the wicked ruler of Mathura, decided to kill Devaki. Devaki’s husband Vasudeva managed to save her life by promising to hand over all their children to Kamsa. When their first son Kirtiman was born, Vasudeva took the
 
baby to Kamsa with a heavy heart in order to keep his promise. Kamsa was pleased by Vasudeva’s strict adherence to truth and his even-mindedness towards friend and foe. He said to Vasudeva: ‘O Vasudeva, take this child back with you, I have no cause to fear him; it is only by your eighth child that I am destined to die.’ No  sooner  did  Vasudeva
 
leave Kamsa’s palace than Narada arrived  on  the  scene. He  told Kamsa: ‘Did you know that Nanda and  the other men and women of Vraja, as well as those of the Yadava clan, are all gods and goddesses in human forms? Once I happened to be there at a meeting of the gods. There I came to know that they were making plans to kill you along with all your relatives and followers. You are very dear to me; so, as a well-wisher, I came to inform you. Now you do whatever you think proper.’ Kamsa was prompt in acting on Narada’s words. He deposed his father Ugrasena and assumed kingship, had Devaki and Vasudeva im prisoned, and began persecuting the Yadavas.
 
 
 
This incident would convince us that Narada was a cruel person, given to provoking ill-feeling and quarrel. That is why he is of en called a piśunaa slanderer, given to backbiting. But Narada is endowed with a vision and memory that is far deeper than that of an ordinary person. So he is able to act in harmony with imperceptible divine plans, and his actions have a subtle and mysterious quality.
 
 
 
In this case, Kirtiman and the other children of Vasudeva were the presiding deities of the eight quarters of the globe. They had to take human birth as a result of Brahma’s curse. They were to regain their godly states only after their human bodies were destroyed by their maternal uncle. Moreover, only when adharma, lawlessness, reaches a climax, and the devotees of the Lord start suf ering torture, Singingdivine glories does Bhagavan appear on earth to protect his devotees by destroying the perpetrators of adharma. So, Narada was only being a voluntary participant in the cosmic drama. Similar altruistic motives may also be discovered in other acts of Narada.
 
 
 
== A Man of Knowledge and a Teacher ==
 
 
 
Nothing in the three worlds is beyond Narada’s ken. In Vedic passages we see him performing yajnas on behalf of kings. Once Valmiki asked Narada if he knew of any person who was perfect  in every respect, and if such perfection was at all humanly possible. Narada told him of Ramachandra and also narrated the story of his entire life. Tis helped Valmiki pen the epic Ramayana.
 
 
 
We also fnd Narada present in udhishthira’s court at Indraprastha, describing the secret behind the birth of the terrible demons Hiranyaksha and Hiranyakashipu, which is ‘impossible even for the gods to know’. Kayadhu, mother of the great devotee Prahlada was provided shelter by Narada in his ashrama while she was expecting. Narada would tell Kayadhu the mysteries of religion, the distinction between Self and non-Self, as well as the essentials of true devotion. Te teachings were also for Prahlada, who was still in his mother’s womb:
 
 
Rsih kārunikastasyāh
 
    prādād­ubhayam­īśvaram;
 
Dharmasya tattvam jñānam ca 
 
    mām­apyuddiśya nirmalam.
 
 
Having me [Prahlada] also in mind, the merciful sage of great spiritual power imparted to her instructions regarding the fawless path of devotion and the enlightenment conveyed by it.<ref> Bhagavata, 7.7.15. </ref>
 
 
 
Later, Prahlada also recalled that ‘owing to the blessings of the sage, those teachings have ever remained fresh in my memory; rsinānugrhītam mām nādhunāpyajahāt smrtih’ (7.7.16).
 
 
 
Narada is also the preceptor of another famous devotee: Dhruva. When he was denied the right to sit on his father’s lap by his stepmother Suruchi, Dhruva rushed back to his other Suniti in tears. Poor Suniti was not a favourite with the king, and all  that  she  could  say by way of  consolation  to Dhruva was this: ‘Ārādhayādhokṣaja­pāda­padmaṁ yadīcchase’dhyāsanam­uttamo yathā; if you wish to sit (on your father’s lap) like Uttama (your stepbrother), then worship the lotus feet of Vishnu’ (4.8.19).
 
 
 
Dhruva took his mother’s advice seriously and controlling his mind lef his father’s palace in search of Vishnu. Narada, omniscient that he is, came to know of Dhruva’s  leaving home. He met him on the way and tried to dissuade him from undertaking all the austerity needed to secure the grace of Vishnu saying: ‘Happiness and unhappiness are due to one’s past karma, so one should remain satisfied with one’s fate; one should not feel jealous of persons with superior qualities; it is difcult to serve and propitiate  the Lord, you can undertake all the necessary spiritual practices once you come of age.’ But far from being dissuaded, Dhruva sought Narada’s help in his search for the Supreme Being:
 
 
Padam tribhuvanotkrstam
 
jigīsoh sādhu­vartma me;
 
Brūhyasmat-­pitrbhir-­brahman
 
anyair-­apyanadhisthitam.
 
 
O great one! I desire to attain to that state which is the most excellent in the three worlds, and which has not been achieved by my forefathers or by any-body else. Please tell me the best way to achieve this (4.8.37).
 
 
 
Pleased with Dhruva’s  resolve, Narada  initiated him with the mantra  ‘Om namo bhagavate vāsudevāya’, advised him to go to Madhuvana on the banks of the Yamuna ‘where Hari’s presence is palpable at all times’, and also instructed him how to undertake contemplation, worship, and other spiritual practices. Equipped with Narada’s instruc-
 
tions, Dhruva undertook  intense tapas and was soon blessed with a vision of the Divine.
 
 
 
 
== Counsellor to Yudhishthira and Krishna ==
 
 
 
When Yudhishthira occupied the throne at the magnifcent new court constructed at Indraprastha by Maya, Narada decided to visit him. At Yudhish-thira’s  request, Narada described  to him  the excellences of some famous celestial courts: those of Indra, the king of the gods; Yama, the god of death; Brahma, the grandsire; Kubera, the king of treasures; and Varuna, the lord of the waters. In the course of conversation, Narada also advised Yu-dhisthira on the science of politics, administration, diplomacy, and warfare. Narada’s political counsels would appear remarkable even  in our days of democracy and globalization.
 
 
 
Narada’s is a multifaceted character that largely remains incomprehensible. All the same, Narada is loved by all. He is a beloved devotee of the Lord. He is the author of a number of texts like the Narada Bhakti Sutra,  the Narada Pancharatra,  and  the Narada Samhita. Above all, Narada is a friend, philosopher, and guide to those who need help to find their way out of distressing situations. Even Krishna, the famous teacher of the Bhagavadgita, sought Narada’s advice when his own kinsmen—the Yadavas, Vrishnis, Bhojas, and Andhakas—were causing him great worry through their unruly behaviour and persistent mutual quarrels. He expressed his anxiety to Narada: ‘It is not proper to disclose one’s secrets to a stupid friend, nor to f ckle souls, even though they be  learned. You are my beloved, and also a great friend. You have a sharp mind; so please tell me what I should do about my relatives who grind my heart with their cruel talk, even as one grinds sticks for f re.’ Narada tells Krishna that this was a ‘domestic problem’. Krishna helped his clansmen by getting them land and wealth; and this turned their heads. He could not possibly take these away without provoking bloodshed. ‘Use then a weapon,’ said Narada, ‘that is not made of steel, that is very mild, and yet capable of piercing all hearts.’ When Krishna inquired what that weapon was, Narada replied: ‘The giving of food to the best of your ability, forgiveness, sincerity, mildness, and honouring those who deserve to be honoured—these constitute a powerful weapon not made of steel. Turn the hearts and minds of your kinsmen with sof  words;
 
for none who is not great and pure at heart, and backed by great achievements and reliable friends, can bear a heavy burden.’<ref>Mahabharata, ‘Shanti Parva’, 81.</ref>
 
 
 
 
== Narada in Krishna’s Eyes ==
 
 
 
Yudhishthira asked Bhishma, who was lying on the ‘bed of arrows’, to tell him about one  ‘who is dear to all, who gladdens all, and who is endued with all merit and accomplishment’. Bhishma recounted Krishna’s words to Ugrasena, who wanted to know why everyone spoke so highly of Narada: ‘Narada is as learned in the scriptures as he is noble in conduct; yet he  is not proud or boastful. Anger,  impudence, fear, and procrastination have  lef  him for good. T  at is why he is adored by all. He never deviates from his word, overpowered by passion or greed; so he deserves worship. High honour is paid to him because he is a man of spiritual knowledge, and is energetic, forgiving, self-possessed, simple, truthful,  intelligent, and modest. He  is  liked be-cause he  is austere, good-natured, eloquent, soft spoken, decorous, pure, amiable, devoid of malice, and an expert  in music. He always does good to others and so is untouched by sin. He never friends pleasure in other’s misfortunes and secures his ends with the aid of scriptural wisdom and knowledge of past events; hence he is universally held in high regard. He seeks to overcome all worldly desires by Prabuddha Bharata chanting the Vedas and attending to the Puranas. He  is a great renouncer. He grants no special favours, nor does he despise anyone. He dispenses knowledge equally to all and speaks according to the temperament and needs of his listener, so his conversation is delightful. He is vastly learned, wise, free from passion, deceit, laziness, greed, and anger; hence he is venerated. He is a man of unf inching devotion. He has gone beyond delusion. He does not strive to achieve wealth or objects of passion. Though totally detached, he takes a keen interest in the af airs of the world. He observes the diversity of  human thought and behaviour, but never speaks ill of anybody. He always strives to reconcile people and does not  indulge  in self -praise. So he  is honoured everywhere. He disregards no science, nor does he repudiate other faiths; but he lives by his own standards of morality. He never wastes a moment and is always a master of his own self. He has earned Self-knowledge through much labour, and he does not refrain from the practice of samadhi. He  is not without sense of shame and  is always open to instruction from others, if that would add to his perfection. Never does he divulge others’ secrets, for his mind is always detached, his intellect f rm, and his heart unmoved by gain or loss. Who would not make this paragon of virtue—ef ficient, holy, provident, and tactful—a beloved friend?’ <ref> Mahabharata, ‘Shanti Parva’, 230; see also Swami
 
Tyagisananda, Aphorisms on the Gospel of Divine Love or Narada Bhakti Sutra (Madras: Ramakrishna Math, 1943), 27–30. </ref>
 
 
 
It is small wonder, therefore, that the Bhagavata also eulogizes Narada:
 
 
Aho devarsir­dhanyo’yam
 
  yat­kīrtim śārngadhanvanah;
 
Gāyan-­mādyannidam tantryā
 
  ramayatyāturam jagat.
 
 
Blessed is this divine sage Narada! For singing the divine glories of the Lord to the accompaniment of his vina, he himself is ever inebriated with di-vine  love, and he enlivens with  joy the hearts of beings distressed by the woes of the world.<ref>Bhagavata, 1.6.39.</ref>
 
 
 
 
 
== Narada’s Political Counsels ==
 
 
 
Narada [to Yudhishthira]: ‘Is the wealth that you earn spent on proper objects? Does your mind take pleasure  in virtue? Are you enjoying the pleasures of  life? Has your mind avoided sinking under their weight? … Ever devoted to the good of all, conversant as you are with the timeliness of all things, do you pursue dharma, artha, kama, and moksha, dividing your time judiciously? …
 
 
 
‘The seven principal officers of your state—the gover-nor of the citadel, the commander of the forces, the chief judge, the general in command of interior aff airs, the chief priest, the chief physician, and the chief astrologer—have not, I hope, succumbed to the infl uence of your foes, nor have they, I hope, been idle in consequence of the wealth they have earned. They are,  I hope, all obedient to you. Your counsels, I hope, are never divulged by your trusted spies, by yourself, or by your ministers. You ascertain,  I hope, what your friends, enemies, and strangers are up to. Do you make peace and war at proper times? Do you observe neutrality towards strangers and persons who are neutral towards you? … The victories of kings can be attributed to good counsels.  Is your kingdom protected by ministers  learned  in the Shastras who keep their own counsel? …
 
 
 
‘Do you never  let agriculturists out of your sight? Are they free of fear in approaching you? Do you execute your plans through people who are trusted, incorruptible, and possessed of practical experience? … Are your forts fi lled with wealth,  food, weapons, water, engines and  instruments, as also with engineers and bowmen? Even a single minister that is intelligent, brave, self-controlled, and possessed of wisdom and judgement, is capable of conferring
 
the highest prosperity on a king or his son; do you have even one such minister? Do you try to know everything about the eighteen tirthas of your enemy and the fi fteen of your own by means of three and three spies, all unacquainted with one another? Is the priest you honour possessed of humility and renown, born of noble lineage, and free from  jealousy and  illiberality? … Have respectable servants been employed by you in offi  ces that are respectable,  indiff erent ones  in offi  ces that are  indiff erent, and inferior ones  in offi  ces that are low? Have you appointed to high offi  ces ministers that are guileless and of good conduct for generations and above the common run? Do you avoid oppressing people with cruel and severe punish-ments? …
 
 
 
‘Is the commander of your forces confi dent, brave,  intelligent, patient, well-behaved, of good birth, devoted to you, and competent? Do you treat with consideration and regard the chief offi  cers of your army that are skilled, forward[-looking], well-behaved, and powerful? Do you give your troops the appointed rations and pay at the proper time? … I hope no single person of unbridled passions is allowed to manage a number of concerns pertaining to the army? Is any of your servants who has accomplished well a particular business by employing a special ability disappointed in obtaining from you a little special regard, and an  increase  in food and pay?  I hope you reward persons of  learning, and humility, and skill  in every kind of knowledge with gifts of wealth and honour proportionate to their qualifi cations? Do you support the wives and children of men who have given their lives for you and have been distressed on your account? Do you cherish with paternal aff ection the enemy that has been weakened or that seeks
 
refuge in you, having been vanquished in battle? Are you equal to all, and can everyone approach you as if you were their father and mother? …
 
 
 
‘Is your expenditure always covered by a fourth, a third, or half of your income?—Do your accountants and clerks apprise you every day,  in the forenoon, of your  income and expenditure? Do you dismiss servants that are skilled in their jobs, popular, and devoted to your welfare for no fault of theirs? Do you employ in your business people that are thievish, or covetous, or minors, or women? Are the agriculturists in your kingdom contented? Are large tanks and  lakes constructed all over your kingdom at proper distances so that agriculture is not exclusively dependent on showers from the heavens? Are agriculturists  in your kingdom wanting  in either seed or food? Do you grant generous loans [of seed] to the tillers? Are the four profes-sions of agriculture, trade, cattle-rearing, and  lending at interest carried on by honest men? Do the fi ve brave and wise men, employed  in the fi ve offi  ces of protecting the city, the citadel, the merchants, and the agriculturists, and of punishing criminals, always benefi t your kingdom by working in unison? For the protection of your cities, have the villages been made  like towns, and the hamlets and village outskirts  like villages? Are all these entirely under your supervision and sway? Are thieves and robbers that sack your towns pursued by your police over the even and uneven parts of your kingdom? … I hope no well-behaved, pure-souled, and respected person is ever ruined and his life taken, on false charge or theft by ministers that are ignorant of the Shastras and acting out of greed. …
 
 
 
‘I hope, your ministers are never won over by bribes, nor do they wrongly decide disputes that arise between the rich and the poor. Do you keep yourself free from the fourteen vices of kings: atheism, untruthfulness, anger, in-caution, procrastination, avoidance of the wise,  idleness, restlessness of mind, seeking counsel from only one person, seeking advice from people unacquainted with the economics of profit, abandonment of settled plans, divulgence of plans, non-accomplishment of projects, and action without refl ection? … Are merchants treated with consideration  in your capital and kingdom; are they allowed to trade without being deceived?
 
 
 
Do you always listen to instructions on dharma and artha from the elderly who are experienced in economics? …‘Do you give regularly to the artisans and artists em-ployed by you the materials needed for their works as well as their due wages? Do you examine their works, appre-ciate them before good men, and reward them, having shown them due respect? … Acquainted with every duty, do you cherish like a father the blind, the dumb, the lame, the deformed, the friendless, and the ascetics that have no homes? Have you overcome these six evils: sleep, idleness, fear, anger, weakness of mind, and procrastination?’—Adapted from Mahabharata, 'Sabha Parva', 5; trans. Kisari Mohan Ganguli.
 
 
 
{{ reflist }}
 

Latest revision as of 02:54, 28 January 2010