Colonial Discourse and the Suffering of Indian American Children Book Cover.webp

Colonial Discourse and the Suffering of Indian American Children is now published after academic peer-review and available through open access.

In this book, we analyze the psycho-social consequences that Indian American children face after they are exposed to the school textbook discourse on Hinduism and ancient India. We show that there is an intimate connection―an almost exact correspondence―between James Mill’s ( a prominent politician in Britain and head of the British East India Company) colonial-racist discourse and the current school-textbook discourse. Consequently, this archaic and racist discourse, camouflaged under the cover of political correctness, produces in the Indian American children the same psychological impact as racism is known to produce: shame, inferiority, embarrassment, identity confusion, assimilation, and a phenomenon similar to racelessness where the children dissociate from the tradition and culture of their ancestors

This book is an outcome of 4 years of rigorous research as a part of our ongoing commitment at Hindupedia to challenge the representation of Hindu Dharma within Academia.


From Hindupedia, the Hindu Encyclopedia

By Swami Harshananda

Apāṅkteya literally means ‘unfit to be included in the row’.

From the most ancient times it is a belief that mind is a product of the food we take, even as the body is, and that purity of food is conducive to the purity of mind.[1]

As a corollary of the doctrine, it was also believed that food handled by persons of doubtful integrity could be defiled and the same had to be purified by appropriate rites. The doctrine seems to have been further extended to declare that certain classes of people, if they were allowed to sit in the same paṅkti (row of people sitting for food), could defile the whole row and hence were branded as ‘apāṅkteya’ or unworthy of being allowed to sit in the row along with others. Sometimes they were also called ‘paṅktiduṣakas,’ those who defile the row.

Though the dharmaśāstras have given long lists of persons who are apāṅkteya, the lists vary from book to book. Manusmrti[2] by far gives the longest list, of 93 persons.

A perusal of these lists shows that persons who have given up their allotted duties (varṇadharmas) and have taken to other means of livelihood, perpetrators of heinous crimes, patients suffering from incurable or infectious diseases, those addicted to drinks and debauchery and the persons who do not follow even elementary principles of ethics and etiquette have all been stigmatized as apāṅkteyas.


  1. Chāndogya Upanisad 7.26.2
  2. Manusmrti 3.150-166
  • The Concise Encyclopedia of Hinduism, Swami Harshananda, Ram Krishna Math, Bangalore