Colonial Discourse and the Suffering of Indian American Children Book Cover.webp

In this book, we analyze the psycho-social consequences faced by Indian American children after exposure to the school textbook discourse on Hinduism and ancient India. We demonstrate that there is an intimate connection—an almost exact correspondence—between James Mill’s colonial-racist discourse (Mill was the head of the British East India Company) and the current school textbook discourse. This racist discourse, camouflaged under the cover of political correctness, produces the same psychological impacts on Indian American children that racism typically causes: shame, inferiority, embarrassment, identity confusion, assimilation, and a phenomenon akin to racelessness, where children dissociate from the traditions and culture of their ancestors.

This book is the result of four years of rigorous research and academic peer-review, reflecting our ongoing commitment at Hindupedia to challenge the representation of Hindu Dharma within academia.

Antaryāmi Brāhmaṇa

From Hindupedia, the Hindu Encyclopedia

By Swami Harshananda

The Brhadāranyaka Upaniṣad, which forms an important part of the Satapatha Brāhmana of the Sukla Yajurveda, is by far the biggest of the extant Upaniṣads. The Satapatha Brāhmana is found to be in two śākhās or recensions

  1. The Kānva
  2. The Mādhyandina

Hence the Upaniṣad also is found to have two recensions. The ‘Brāhmaa’ of the third chapter of this Upaniṣad is called as Antaryāmi Brāhmana, since it deals with the topic of Brahman as the antaryāmin (‘the indwelling spirit’).

The third chapter starts with the convening of a conference of ‘scholars of the Brahman’ by the king Janaka of Videha, who expresses a desire to know the best among them (brahmiṣṭha), and offers rich presents. The sage Yājñavalkya comes forward to take away the presents even before proving his mettle in the assembly. This naturally enrages the assembled sages who start challenging him with intricate philosophical queries. However, Yājñavalkya proves more than a match for all of them.

The seventh brāhmaṇa, which is the Antaryāmi Brāhmana, starts with the question of Uddālaka Āruṇi about the antaryāmin or the indwelling spirit in the universe. Yājñavalkya replies that it is the Ātman or the Self that resides in everything, whether it is the elements like the earth, or the worlds like heaven or living beings or sense organs or mind. It controls them all from within. He knows them all but they don't know him. He is actually the knower and can never become an object of perception or knowledge. He is the eternal Self of all.

If the Kānvaśākhā stops with this, the Mādhyandinaśakhā continues the description and adds

  • ‘Ya ātmani tiṣṭhan...’ - ‘Who, remains inside the ātman...’

It lends strength to the belief that the ātman (the individual self) and Brahman (the Supreme Self) are different and that the latter controls the former. This comes in handy for the dualistic schools like Viśiṣtādvaita Vedānta to defend their position.


  • The Concise Encyclopedia of Hinduism, Swami Harshananda, Ram Krishna Math, Bangalore